A Self-Fuelled Power Generation system giving a ultra high output efficiency of 300%!

HIGH EFFICIENCY ENERGY SYSTEM INVENTED IN INDIA!

A Self-Fuelled Power Generation system giving a ultra high output efficiency of 300% and this innovation is from India! 

• The Mechanical Power Plant integrated with an innovated flywheel based power Booster System (The SMART energy system of Jayaprakash from South India) is demonstrated to deliver an extra high efficiency which is equal to or more than 300%!

Compare the Efficiency of the Different Power Plants around the world

• The coal plant efficiency ranges from 32% to 42% (Coal based power accounts for almost 41 % of the world’s electricity generation!)
• Natural Gas fired (including LNG fired) power plants have an efficiency of 32 % to 38 % (They account for almost 20 % of the world’s electricity generation)
• Renewables and mainly Hydro turbines, have the highest efficient of all power conversion process with efficiency range of 85 to 90 %.
• Wind turbines have an overall conversion efficiency of 30 % to 45 %.(These two renewable sources, though efficient, are dependent on availability of the energy source)
• Solar thermal systems can achieve efficiency up to 20%.
• Geo thermal Plant systems, can achieve efficiencies in the range of 35 %
• Nuclear plant (Thermal cycle) efficiencies are in the range of 38 %.
• Diesel engines (large capacity industrial engines) deliver efficiencies in the range of 35 – 42 %.
• Mechanical Power Booster System (The SMART energy system) of Jayaprakash demonstrates to deliver an extra high efficiency which is equal to or more than 300%!

Quick Review of Advantages of the invented SMART Energy System:

• Practical, cost-effective solution for a sustainable energy future
• Provides reliable and affordable electricity, contribute to a strong economy, and do not compromise our health or our climate
• Health and Environment Friendly with almost Zero-waste disposal
• External fuel is essentially NOT required, and operates pollution-free, and is green!
• Easy customization and can be configured to client prerequisites
• Uses Less components giving less maintenance requirements
• Easy to handle, transport parts and has quick installation scope (universal!)
• Less usage of man power, land area, working space etc
• Less (awfully a lesser amount of) manufacturing cost per KW of Power generation (Scope for at least 10 fold revenue inflows at the existing power tariff/unit rate)
• Less power-transmission cost and less distribution losses as standalone system
• Easy to use in remote areas (as standalone system) where it is hard to lay transmission cable-lines
• Scope to connect to grid and replace many other plant systems used anywhere in the world!

It is Energy for All Revolution!  Please read more details of the proposed  'FREE (SELF) FUELLED CLEANTECH POWER PLANT' at www.aceinventions.blogspot.in

The BELOW GIVEN notes and sketches are aDAPTED from a COMPARISON NOTE GIVEN ON AN INTERNET ARTICLE published on wsj BY RANI MOLLA

The true cost of electricity is difficult to pin down. That’s because a number of inputs comprise it: the cost of fuel itself, the cost of production, as well as the cost of dealing with the damage that fuel does to the environment.

Energy Points, a company that does energy analysis for business, factors in the these myriad values in terms of what percentage of the energy input—fossil fuel energy, plus energy for production and energy for environmental mitigation—will become usable electricity.

The chart above shows that fossil fuels yield, on a national average, only a portion of their original energy when converted into electricity. That’s because they are fossil fuels that require other fossil fuels to make the conversion into electricity; their emissions, such as carbon dioxide, also require a lot of energy to be mitigated. Renewables, however, have energy sources that aren’t fossil fuel and their only other energy inputs are production and mitigating the waste from that production. That actually results in more energy produced than fossil fuels put in. Wind, the most efficient fuel for electricity, creates 1164% of its original energy inputs when converted into electricity; on the other end of the efficiency spectrum, coal retains just 29% of its original energy. 
Electricity generation is only conversion of energy from different forms to Electricity which is the most convenient form of energy. How efficiently does this conversion take place? Let us look at the conversion efficiencies of the common types of Electricity generation plants.

These are national averages, meaning that, for example, solar might be more efficient in a place such as Arizona with lots of infrastructure and direct sunlight than it is across the whole nation.

In any given area, electricity might come from a number of different sources, including oil, coal, gas, wind, hydropower and solar. Each has its own set of costs, both internal and external. From Energy Points:

This metric is a more rounded calculation than merely cost or carbon footprint. For example, hydro electricity has the lowest carbon footprint (4 gCO2/kWh), but when Energy Points factors in the full lifecycle of the different fuels, wind is the most efficient. Additionally, natural gas is the cheapest fuel to produce electricity, according to levilized cost data from the Environmental Protection Agency, which measured the total cost of building and operating a generating plant over an assumed financial life and duty cycle. Though it’s cheap, it’s not very efficient if you factor in its production and emissions.

CORRECTION: Hydro electricity has the lowest carbon footprint of 4 gCO2/kWh, an earlier version of this post said the number was 4 kgCO2/kWh.      (Source: Http://on.wsj.com/X6UVZ7)